Don Davis has been the Forum Communications Minnesota Capitol Bureau chief since 2001, covering state government and politics for two dozen newspapers in the state. Don also blogs at Capital Chatter on Areavoices.
- Member for
- 4 years 8 months
ST. PAUL - Minnesota senators sprinted through their latest budget bills Wednesday, and legislative leaders met several times with the governor trying to avoid a repeat of earlier budget vetoes. It was unclear late Wednesday when, or if, the House would pass the bills. House leaders were waiting to see if the high-level talks produced results. Lawmakers worked late Wednesday night in an attempt to pass the bills soon enough that time would remain for yet another try if Gov. Tim Pawlenty vetoes this second round of bills.
ST. PAUL - Since Minnesota legislators arrived in St. Paul on Jan. 3, they approved - and Gov. Tim Pawlenty signed - $2.6 billion of spending. That may sound impressive to the average Minnesotan, but the two-year budget lawmakers must pass will be $35 billion, more or less. And by this time next week, legislators are supposed to be back home at their regular jobs, getting ready to take vacations or catching up on honey-do lists after being in St.
ST. PAUL - Two young girls were skipping rope just down the street from 1006 Summit Ave. in St. Paul. They were laughing during their Thursday morning playtime, enjoying each other's company. At 1006, the governor's official residence, Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party legislative leaders downed French toast, bacon, fresh fruit and other breakfast foods with Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty, apparently getting along as well as the little girls.
ST. PAUL - The focus of a bill funding outdoors, water and arts programs on Wednesday became whether it is best to put the proposal in the state Constitution or to simply pass a law. For seven hours the answer was split after a Senate committee decided it was wrong to budget in the Constitution while a House proposal favored a constitutional amendment.
Minnesota lawmakers will have one more chance to pass a statewide smoking ban. House and Senate negotiators approved a strict smoking ban early Wednesday. The negotiators' conference committee decided to allow a few relatively minor exemptions to the ban and leaves decisions on outdoors smoking up to local governments. However, the bill - which cannot be further changed by lawmakers - does not permit smoking rooms in bars, a provision the House earlier approved.
ST. PAUL - A Minnesota Senate committee decided that one property tax relief measure - funded by an income tax increase - wasn't enough, so on Wednesday it voted for a second one. The Taxes Committee approved a House-passed proposal "in the event this session stalls, and we are not able to get an omnibus tax bill out," Committee Chairman Sen. Tom Bakk, DFL-Cook, said. The bill "is a safety valve" in case the broader tax bill stalls, Bakk said. It would increase income taxes on couples earning more than $400,000 annually to finance a bigger property tax refund program $223 million.
ST. PAUL - Gov. Tim Pawlenty was in his office just five minutes Tuesday - and did not even take time to change clothes after touring a northeastern Minnesota forest fire - when he vetoed an $11 billion health bill. And he promised that more vetoes are coming as early as today, if the higher education funding bill reaches his desk.
House and Senate negotiators think they have a transportation funding bill the Legislature can pass, despite a threatened veto by Gov. Tim Pawlenty. They won't reveal what they plan to approve until today, but there were indications the bill could vote to increase the gasoline tax a nickel a gallon "It's going to be significant enough that we are in a good position for an override," Rep.
ST. PAUL - Gov. Tim Pawlenty did as he promised - vetoed two more of the state's major funding bills and pared down another. And the Republican governor said he is ready to wield his veto pen some more. However, he also signed a couple of bills. One funds public safety programs to the tune of $2 million.
Drivers will need to use approved child restraints for children younger than 8, new drivers would face new restrictions and more vehicles could be stopped if occupants don't wear seat belts under a bill senators preliminarily passed on a voice vote Monday. Conservative Republicans and some Iron Rangers tried and failed to strip the bill of some new requirements. Child restraints now are required for children 4 and younger. The bill written by Sen. Steve Murphy, DFL-Red Wing, requires children younger than 8 to be restrained. "It's excessive." Sen.